The Web Content Creation Spiral

Thoughts on essential factors of web content creation spiral which is a new model for understanding information flow in the social age. The “publish – share” model is not enough to describe the complex of various content creation activities. I am thinking about a new analysis framework to catch the rise of content curation.

1. Publishable: Publishable means you can put your thoughts out in public
2. Findable: Findable means your audience can find your published contents easily
3. Curateable: Curatable means you allow your audience to do more curating work than one-click sharing
4. Shareable: Sharable means you audience can share your content to their friends easily

Sharing has more wider meaning that Isaac Mao described in his excellent essay on Sharism. You can write a blog post to share your ideas or a local news story. But I’d like to use the term Publish to refer to this kind of sharing of original creation.

Most of people just share contents with their friends by clicking the Facebook Like button, Tweet button, or “share this” grouped buttons on the webpage they are currently viewing.

Curating contents is not original content creating, it means recreating new contents based original creation. Curating contents requires more time and skill than simple one-click sharing. As I wrote a post here early, there are at least eight kind of actions of curating: translating, highlighting, editing, ranking, re-formating, collecting, embedding, and designing.

Then, let’s think about how content publishers can make curating contents possible, efficient, and meaningful. Curateable leads us to drill down on several issues including copy right (adopting CC), Social Curation Optimization (SCO, compared with SEO), technical side (Friendly URLs, metadata, Open APIs), community engagement (special programs to drive content curating) and etc.

For example, both articles on New York Times site (nytimes.com) and TED talks on TED.com are shareable, but only TED talks are curateable because you can translate them to your language while you can’t translate New York Times articles for public usage without copyright permission from them.

First, the TED’s adoption of Creative Commons license is an important step to made TED talks curating possible. Second, the TED Open Translation Project is a special community engagement program which made the curating work efficient.

Also, publisher need to take care the metadata of their contents for both sharable and curateable. Many bloggers don’t care their blog’s metadata. The result of empty description of blog posts is lot of sharing tools and content curation tools display the shared/curated links with tons of key words for all webpages from same blog. When you share these kind of webpage links in Google+ stream, you need to remove the description. It’s doesn’t make sense!

Posted in Curation Commons | Leave a comment

What’s Curation Commons?

Web curation has been a hot topic since last year. More and more people start to use web curation tools for difference purposes. After blogger, there is a new term called web curator. Andy Carvin, who is from NPR, is aggregating and curating many streams of information about the protests in Tunisia and Egypt. Ethan Zuckerman published an excellent interview with Carvin exploring why he’s been posting an average of 400 tweets daily for the last month. His story is a great example of how web curators can make a difference.

Ethan’s post inspired me to think the idea of Curation Commons, a term coined by me.

Basically, Curation Commons means people curate public web content to build a CC licensed content network that anyone can access on the Web. Curation Commons is inspired by Creative Commons. The Web has a lot of contents. Now we need curators to re-organize these original creations. People can choose Creative Commons licenses for their curated contents to form a new content network anyone can assess on the Web.

Curation Commons content network can be formed by the following eight ways of curating.

1. Translating:
Offer you contents in 100 languages, here is an example from TED.

2. Highlighting:
Pick several sentences from an article with three thousands characters, so that the core idea will be more powerful to spread.

3. Editing:
Put pieces of contents together to form a new content with new meaning. Express your opinions by organizing them.

4. Ranking:
Put similar contents together and rank them by importance.

5. Re-formating:
Transform contents from one medium format to another, such as from text to video, from audio to presentation etc.

6. Collecting:
Collect contents from difference sources to present a new picture on the topic.

7. Embedding:
Embed original contents to a blog or a site, then ask readers to embed them to their sites.

8. Designing:
Change the font size, use different font, match the words with pictures to highlight the theme of the topic.

Posted in Curation Commons | Leave a comment

Relevancy linking: a new approach to organizing information

Note: This is a test post. I am testing BagTheWeb.com’s POSTS feature. Check here to view this post’s comparison version on BagTheWeb.com

Organizing information is an important and common task in the lives of human beings and in the life of a society because we organize to understand, to explain, and to control with order. People have used three approaches for organizing information on the Web: classification systems, chronological order, and folksonomy (a.k.a. tagging).

People use classification systems in both the physical and virtual worlds. For example, classification is the main method to organize books in libraries or categorize living things in biology. The hierarchical tree structure of a classification system is also applied in designing the information architecture of individual websites.

Chronological order is a classical approach for organizing information in human society. This approach is also a common method used in the design of Web applications. The email system was created using chronological order. In the late 1990s the blog system was designed with reverse chronological order. As social network sites became popular, chronological order has been applied to feed readers, micro-blogging sites, lifestream sites, and other web applications.

According to the “Folksonomy” entry on Wikipedia, “Folksonomies became popular on the Web around 2004 as part of social software, such as social bookmarking and photograph annotation. Tagging, which is characteristic of Web 2.0 service, allows users to collectively classify and find information. Some websites include tag cloud as a way to visualize tags in a folksonomy.”

Basically, BagTheWeb not only creates a platform to enable people to organize information easily but also organizes information using an innovative approach: relevancy linking. The new approach surpasses chronological order, classification, and folksonomy.

Relevancy linking is our approach to developing the bagging platform. A bag is a collection of grouped Web links and bag links. Our bagging system involves two-level architecture. On the first level, any webpage can be linked into a bag and connected to other Web links based on the theme of the bag. On the second level, the group of links in a bag can be connected to other groups of links in other bags as bags are linked.

By arranging the relationships between Web links and bags, people can organize online information in a new way, different from traditional approaches.

Our bagging system is not designed by using the chronological approach. Instead we focus on the relationship between items because we learn by connecting.

The bagging system has no categories and subcategories. Any bag can be a starting point on the information path. People can arrange information in a free structure and can design their bag’s network in any format. Imagine a bag as a Lego block that can be assembled and connected in many ways to construct such objects as vehicles, buildings, and even working robots. People can arrange bags to construct their personal information networks in any way they desire.

Tagging and bagging differ. Tagging is used to archive individual resources for re-finding, but bagging is designed to collect individual resources to create new contents with new meanings. A bag is not a simple aggregation of individual resources but a new creation that has its own theme resulting from ordering and editing. In addition, the semantics of the connections between bags is richer than that of tags.

Posted in Information Architecture | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

The Memories of Independence Day Holidays

Two years ago, I was an active user on SlideShare.net, I am now working for a new web curation platform BagTheWeb.com. It is a new and exciting experience for me.

Yesterday I created a unique bag to share my memories of Independence Day holidays during past three years. It records the tracks of my career as well as my interests and activities. I now clearly see the fragments of these memories remixed into a big picture I call Curation Commons. The idea of Curation Commons is a dream that might change, but it reveals an exciting view toward the future. The process of building this bag has also inspired me to think what happiness is. Here comes its blog version.

2008

In 2008, my girlfriend lived in New York, while I stayed in Houston. During holidays, I often flew to New York to visit my girl friend. In that time, I was an active user on SlideShare.net. During the Independence Day holiday of the year, I created the a slideshow called Fireworks Commons with photos under the Creative Commons license to share my experience.

This is not for a presentation — it is a story slideshow. By using CC-licensed photos, you can create amazing slideshows to express your emotions and opinions. In fact, this is web curation.

2009

In January 2009, I married my girlfriend. She moved to Houston from New York in March. On the night of July 4, we went to watch fireworks together. During the holiday, we read the book Outliers together.

In July 2009, I was busy on the TEDtoChina project during my spare time. I designed pictures for the TEDtoChina.com site by using CC-licensed photos, and required bloggers to republish their posts on the site.

Talent is Overrated

The main theme of the first week of the TEDtoChina site is the logic of success and the essence of effort. First, we introduced Pop!Tech, which is a conference similar with TED. Second, we published a review on TED speaker Malcolm Gladwell’s new book Outliers accompanied by a video of his speech on 2008 Pop!Tech conference. Third, we published another review on the book Talent is Overrated, which is related to Outliers.

Again, this is web curation. Designing and editing are part of Curation Commons.

2010

In July 2010, my wife is seven months pregnant, and we are expecting a son in September. She has been in Houston for one and half years. We enjoy our life together and eagerly await the arrival of the new member of our family.

I have been working as an information architect and a user experience designer on BagTheWeb as my day job. The project remixes my day job and my leisure-time interests. By curating web creative contents, people can form a new layer of open contents based on original contents. This is not only a new tool but also a new approach to create the future of free culture.

What Happiness Is

One of my most favorites TED talks is Martin Seligman on three kinds of happiness: “The first path, positive emotion. The second path is eudaimonian flow. And the third path is meaning. This is the most venerable of the happinesses, traditionally. And meaning in this view consists of — very parallel to eudaimonia, it consists of knowing what your highest strengths are and using them to belong to and in the service of something larger than you are.

p.s. The below is the embeded bag, you can click its title to view the whole bag.

Posted in Curation Commons | Leave a comment